Alaska Science Forum
August 9, 2001Article #1554
by Ned Rozell
This column is provided as a public service by the Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, in cooperation with the UAF research community. Ned Rozell is a science writer at the institute.
Hubbard Glacier may be creeping back into the spotlight.
Located near Yakutat, where Alaska’s panhandle connects to the mainland,
Hubbard Glacier in 1986 nosed up on land to pinch off the salt-water channel
between Russell Fiord and the Gulf of Alaska. Before the ice dam broke a
few months later, Russell Fiord became a lake, trapping harbor seals and
other ocean creatures and attracting the attention of national media.
This summer, area residents say the 200-foot tall face of Hubbard Glacier
seems to again be closing the narrow waterway that connects Russell Fiord
to the ocean.
Patricia O’Connor, a ranger for the U.S. Forest Service in Yakutat,
has been receiving phone calls from residents who want to know if Hubbard
Glacier will seal off Russell Fiord soon. Dan Elsberg, a glaciologist at
the Geophysical Institute, recently wrote a letter to a representative for
an Alaska Native corporation who had the same question.
In May 1986, Hubbard advanced to Gilbert Point and blocked the entrance
to Russell Fiord, creating a captive body of water more than 40 miles long.
With its connection to the ocean dammed, “Russell Lake” rose
75 feet with freshwater glacial runoff. People concerned about harbor seals
trapped in the lake helped a few seals over a gravel bar and back to the
Gulf of Alaska.
Mother Nature made things easier when the ice dam broke in October 1986.
In less than 24 hours, the water level dropped 75 feet to sea level. If
the ice dam had persisted, the rising water of Russell Lake would have overflowed
into Old Situk Creek, causing it to swell to 20 times its present size.
The creek, southeast of Yakutat, could be rudely awakened sometime soon.
In a 1991 report, scientists predicted that Hubbard Glacier would probably
dam the channel to Russell Fiord again by the year 2000. Dennis Trabant,
one of the glaciologists who contributed to the report, said he based his
forecast on Hubbard Glacier’s past advances. Hubbard’s erratic
nature makes Trabant, of the U.S. Geological Survey, hesitant to again predict
when Russell Fiord will become a lake.
Hubbard Glacier is fed by icefields in Canada so large that it will continue
advancing regardless of climate warming or cooling. The glacier has been
calving in the ocean while advancing since at least 1895.
Today, the icy wall of Hubbard Glacier looms over the rocky shore of Gilbert
Point. O’Connor, the ranger, said the salt-water channel between land
and glacier seems to be narrowing, strengthening a “tidal rip,”
during which boats have trouble advancing against the current.
“People are still going up there boating, but it’s a little
tricky,” she said. “The charter boat captain we use can only
go through there at slack tide.”
O’Connor, who flew over the site recently, said the gap between the
snout of the glacier and land is about 100-to-150 yards. Elsberg confirmed
that distance after studying GPS and video data from flights along the glacier’s
front in August 2000 and June 2001.
Tidal currents that scour icebergs off the snout of Hubbard Glacier have
kept the entrance to Russell Fiord open while the rest of Hubbard’s
10-mile face has advanced at a more rapid rate. With snowfields the size
of Lower 48 counties feeding Hubbard Glacier, the re-birth of Russell Lake
may not be far off.
“It’s just a matter of time before these general advances of the glacier can overwhelm tidal losses,” Trabant said.