|

Scientific personnel
V. E. Romanovsky, T. E. Osterkamp, T. S. Sazonova, G. S. Tipenko,
D. O. Sergueev (UAF) as well as N. I. Shender, V. G. Rusakov, V.
T. Balobaev (Yakutsk Permafrost Institute).
This material is based upon work supported by the National
Science Foundation under Grant OPP-9721347. Any opinions, findings,
conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those
of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
National Science Foundation.


Project scope and objectives
At the present time, due to development of General Circulation
Models and growing needs of understanding the impact of global climate
change on the ecosystems, it becomes necessary to assess permafrost
conditions for the circumpolar region in order to include them into
GCMs. Collecting all necessary data for the entire circumpolar
region in order to evaluate permafrost dynamics can be a very difficult
task.
The transect method could be well suited for this
purpose. The main idea of the transect approach is to study permafrost
spatial distribution and dynamics in regions for which significant
amount of data is available. Next step is to find differences and
similarities between different transects and on this basis try to
interpolate and extrapolate data between them to obtain the entire
Circumpolar picture of permafrost conditions.
For our studies we choose two transects Alaskan
North Slope transect, which includes the area of the Kuparuk and
Sagavanirktok River basins, and the Tiksi-Yakutsk East Siberian
transect, designated as the Far East Siberian transect in the IGBP
Northern Eurasia Study project (IGBP-NES).
There are three objectives in this analysis:
- Creating a database using GIS for the East Siberian transect
which will include the most important environmental characteristics
and data from the intensive permafrost study sites;
- Reconstruct the past (last century), hindcasts and forecasts
of the 50 to 100 years active layer and permafrost dynamics for
key sites along the East Siberian Transect
and scale up this information for the entire transect area;
- Comparing present (measured), past and future (calculated) characteristics
of the active layer and permafrost dynamics along the East
Siberian Transect with those from the Alaskan
Transect.

Main features of East
Siberian transect
|
Click on each map to see full size image (50 - 180 kb)
|
This transect was established in 1998
as part of IGBP Northern Eurasia Study project. East-Siberian
transect centered on the 135° meridian and is a
collaborative effort of IGBP-NES with the GAME project
of the WCRP. The transect is centered on the 135°
meridian and expanded from 70 degrees of Northern Latitude
(N.L.) to 60 degrees of N.L. and spans the entire zone
of continuous permafrost in East Siberia
|
 |
Active layer thickness and mean annual
ground temperatures along with the thickness of perennially
frozen earth material are the major characteristics
of permafrost. Within the East-Siberian transect active
layer thickness varies from 0.2 m, in the most northern
parts of the transect and in mountainous areas, to up
to 3 m in central and southern-western parts of the
transect.
|
|
Permafrost temperatures or mean annual
ground temperatures, usually measured at the depth of
10 15m, can be as low as 10 to 14°C
in the north and in uplands and can reach 0 to 2°C
in the most southern parts of the transect.
|
 |
|
 |
|
The map of landscapes and permafrost
conditions in Yakutia (scale 1: 2 500 000). Russian
Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Permafrost
Institute. Chief editor: P.I.Melnikov. Digitized
by Permafrost Laboratory, GI UAF
|
|
 |
East-Siberian Transect spans the entire territory
of Sakha republic. One can find great variability of landscapes
within the transect. About one third of the transect is within
the mountainous areas.
Permafrost conditions vary a lot too - from
thick permafrost (up to 1.5 km) in central and northern parts
of the transect to 20 30 m thick in southern parts.
|
|
Ice complex - or "yedoma" is the most interesting
and intriguing feature of the transect. About 30% of the territory
of the transect is underlain by these peculiar sediments,
which can contain up to 80 percent of ice and the thickness
of sediments can reach up to 100 m.
However, there are several features which make
the East Siberia transect an unique area. This region has
the most extremely continental climate of any circumpolar
area, most of the area is covered by large stands of deciduous
larch forests, and the transition zone between tundra and
boreal forest is gradual.
|
 |

Data of East Siberian transect
 |
For evaluating the tendency of changes in air
and ground temperature for the last 30 years on the territory
of East -Siberian transect, the data from 52 stations
(click to see actual data in form of a table) was processed
and analyzed. The data is the courtesy of the Permafrost
Institute in Yakutsk. East-Siberian transect was established
in 1998 as a part of IGBP
Northern Eurasia Study project. It spans the entire zone of
continuous permafrost in East Siberia.
Only 29 meteostations are within the area of
the transect. Most of the stations, within or outside the
transect, have operated for more than 40 years (table1). Average
mean annual temperatures vary within the transect area from
less than 16°C in the Verkhoyansk region (data available
since 1980) to 8°C near the southern limit of the
transect.
|
|
The data includes daily, monthly and mean annual
values of air temperatures and precipitation, 10-day mean
depths of snow cover, snow density and water equivalent, and
the number of days with snow cover for each month. The duties
of these stations also include measurements of the ground
surface temperatures and snow surface temperatures during
the winter. In addition to, each station has several shallow
boreholes (0.1 to 3.2 meters deep) where yearly to daily temperature
measurements were performed. High inertia mercury thermometers
were used for measuring temperatures. Such thermometers give
an error of + 0.1°C.
Generally, the accuracy and quality of measurements
varies depending on the year of collection, but the measurement
technique and equipment have remained standard for the last
25 years.
|
 |

Reconstruction and forecast
A simple and accurate model for evaluating the permafrost
dynamics was developed in Geophysical Institute Permafrost Lab (GIPL).
The GIPL model is a fusion of the modified
Kudryavtsev's approach, which is a set of analytical formulas
for active layer thickness and mean annual ground temperature calculations,
with a Geographic Information System (GIS). The GIS contains several
layers, representing geology, vegetation, mean annual air temperatures,
air temperatures amplitudes and mean annual snow thickness.
G
I
S
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
|
Input parametrs: layers
|
 |
Program that calculates Active Layer
Thickness
|
 |
Output:
|
|
Geology, soil properties (moisture)
Mean Annual Air Temperature
Air Temperature Amplitude
Snow Cover Thickness
|
And Permafrost Temperatures (Fortran)
Avenue Code that Performs the Interpolation and Creates Grid
|
Map of Active Layer Thickness Distribution
Map of Permafrost Temperatures Distribution
|
Input parameters of East
Siberian Transect
Program block
The program for active layer thickness and mean annual
permafrost temperatures calculations - "Kudr" - was written in Fortran
and utilizes
Kudryavtsev's formula. Kudryavtsev's formula is an analytic
solution for heat conduction equation for a one dimensional case
with periodical stable regime.
Upper boundary condition is in the form of a periodic
function - representing the annual cyclic variations of air temperatures.
The formula allows to obtain maximum thickness of active layer and
mean annual temperature at the bottom of active layer.
The evaluation of the GIPL performance showed that
when applied to long-term (decadal or longer time scale) averages,
this model achieves an accuracy of + 0.2÷ -0.4ºC
for the mean annual ground temperatures and + 0.1 ÷ -
0.3 m for the active layer thickness calculations.
Output of East Siberian transect
HadCM2
Click on each map to see animation changes in the active
layer thickness with 25 - 30 years time step (100 - 300 kb)
|
Scenarios of future climate changes - Maps of the active
layer thickness
If the scenario of global warming, used in our studies is
correct, then we might expect the considerable warming of
ground temperatures (to 3 4 degrees C) and increase
in active layer thickness (up to 1 1.5 m) within East-Siberian
transect.
The increase in air temperatures will have the
most pronounced effect on permafrost in southern parts of
East-Siberian transect and even cause the taliks formation
and permafrost degradation on, where only seasonal freezing
takes place.
The increase in permafrost temperatures and
in active layer thickness will not be uniform in time and
there will be some years during which decrease in temperatures
may occur.
|
|
|

Results
|
Five GCM (General Circulation Models) have been
used in this research. These models were chosen for ACIA (Arctic
Climate Impact Assessment) program. Two of them are GCMs
of Hadley Climate Center: HadCM2 and HadCM3. Model HadCM2
based on historical data and was used as a reference for comparison
with other models. Had CM2 scenario was chosen as a reference
one because it is based on historical data and other values
in points are obtained by interpolation between meteorological
stations at which measurements have been taken.
The forecast for future (2000 2100 years)
was obtained by using random numbers and choosing from historical
data and then the trend of global warming has been applied.
The other models include GCMs from Canadian
Climate Center (CCC), NCAR (CSM), and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics
Laboratory (GFDL).
|
|
East
Siberian Transect
|
Alaskan
Transect
|
|
Click on each chart to see full size
image (90 - 500 kb)
|
|
|
|
|
The comparison shows that the range of increase
in five-years mean ground temperatures varies from 2 to 5
degrees C for different models for northern parts of the East
Siberian transect and from 1 to 3 degrees C for southern parts.
GFDL and HadCM3 models are the closest to the referenced scenario.
Three models CCC, HadCM3 and the reference model predict the
formation of the zone on which permafrost is thawing from
the surface. Reference scenario predicts that the zone with
thawing permafrost will occupy almost entire southern-western,
upland part of the East Siberian transect. According to CCC
and HadCM3 models that zone will be considerably smaller but
at the same location.
Comparison of four GCMs scenarios with
referenced one shows that the increase in active layer thickness
will range from 1 to 2m in mountainous and upland areas with
coarse sediments and from 0.5 to 1m in valleys and lowlands.
The maximum increase in active layer thickness will take place
in central parts with coarse sediments of glacial origin.
GFDL and HadCM3 models are the closest to
the reference model. When considering the future of the ice
complex and taking into account that the thickness of
the protection layer is 1.8 2.5 meters, it is possible
to point out a zone within which increase in active layer
thickness will exceed 1.5 m. This zone is narrow and located
on the eastern bank of Lena River. Ice complex
are syncryogenic soils with huge ice wedges in silt matrix,
volumetric ice content can reach 80%, the thickness of those
sediments can be up to 100 m.
If active layer reaches the ice horizon, the consequences
can be quite severe. Ice melting will lead to subsidence of
the ground and water pools formation. Water pools in summer
time will increase heat influx into the ground and will cause
ice to melt further and faster.
|
The permafrost degradation from the surface
will start as early as 2025 and will progress to 2099 according
to the CCC, GFDL, HADCM2, HADCM3, and ECHAM models. The spatial
dynamics of the permafrost degradation will not be uniform
in time. There will be cold and warm time periods on the background
of the trend of the mean annual air temperature warming. HADCM2,
HADCM3 and GFDL predict that the area with the permafrost
degradation will be in the south-eastern part of the Alaskan
transect. The area will be within the Brooks Range and in
the Interior according to CCC and ECHAM. The relative increase
in mean annual ground temperatures will be from 1 to 6 ºC
by the end of 21 st century. The active layer thickness will
be up to 0.5 m deeper by the year 2099.
The analysis of GCMs showed that CSM, ECHAM
and GFDL are the closest to the reference HADCM2 GCM in terms
of mean annual air temperatures.
The permafrost degradation from the surface
will start as early as 2025 and will progress to 2099 according
to the CCC, GFDL, HADCM2, HADCM3, and ECHAM models. The dynamics
of the area with permafrost degradation will not be uniform.
There will be cold and warm time periods on the background
of the trend of the mean annual air temperatures warming.
HADCM2 and GFDL predict that the area with the permafrost
degradation will be in the south-eastern part of the Alaskan
transect. This area will be within the Brooks Range and the
Interior according to CCC, ECHAM, and HADCM3.
According to the GCMs the relative increase
in mean annual ground temperatures will be from 2 to 6 ºC
by the end of 21st century. This increase will cause a deepening
of the active layer thickness by up to 0.5 m.
|
|
The Area with Permafrost Degradation
|
|
|
|
In the 21 st century the active layer
thickness will deepen by 0.5 - 2 m everywhere within
the East-Siberian transect, and that mean annual ground temperatures
will rise by 2 - 6ºC according to all GCMs except CSM.
However, the increase in mean annual ground temperatures and
the active layer thickness will not be uniform in time. There
will be relatively cold and warm periods caused by natural
variations of air temperatures. These variations will be superimposed
on the background warming trend. In the Alaskan transect,
the relative increase in mean annual ground temperatures will
be from 2 to 6 ºC by the end of 21 st century. This increase
will cause the deepening of the active layer thickness up
to 0.5 m.
|
|
Mean annual ground temperatures at 1 m
Depth (Five-years running average)
|
|
|
|