Skip to main content
 An illustration from the 1940s of a new ice age overrunning New York City. The image appears in the book, "Ice Ages and Astronomical Causes,” by Richard Muller and Gordon MacDonald.
An illustration from the 1940s of a new ice age overrunning New York City. The image appears in the book, "Ice Ages and Astronomical Causes,” by Richard Muller and Gordon MacDonald.

Cooler decades ahead, researcher says

Syun-Ichi Akasofu has a forecast for the average global temperature during the next few decades—cool.
Akasofu, the former director of the University of Alaska Fairbanks' Geophysical Institute and International Arctic Research Center, was known as an aurora expert for most of his career. Now, people are citing his opinions on global warming. Rush Limbaugh and syndicated columnist Cal Thomas recently mentioned Akasofu, who thinks it’s likely that the planet will cool down until about 2030, and then warm slightly thereafter. That notion is contrary to the prediction of steadily increasing warmth made by members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Unlike those scientists, Akasofu thinks natural forces affect climate much more than carbon dioxide, which warms the globe by trapping heat.

Akasofu, who gave a recent presentation on his ideas in Fairbanks, bases his cooling prediction on his studies of climate records that go back several centuries, such as the breakup date of a lake in Japan that people have documented since the 1400s. He looks back to the distant past to try to see patterns of natural changes that have been occurring before levels of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere began skyrocketing after World War II.

When he looks at long-term climate records, Akasofu sees a consistent warming since about 1800. For him, it’s as simple as drawing a straight line through the ups and downs of global temperature from 1800 to 2000.

“This is why glaciers have been melting since about 1800,” he said. “Because the planet is still warming up from the Little Ice Age (a cold period from about 1400 to 1800).

“The IPCC paid attention to only the latest temperature rise, from 1975 to 2000,” Akasofu said. “This is what I call ‘instant climatology.’ They didn’t look at the Little Ice Age. There’s no excuse for that.”

Akasofu has a similar critique of scientists who compare photos of glaciers that have shrunken in the last decades—that it’s too brief a look at Earth’s climate.

“It’s not the whole story,” he said.

In trying to reconstruct the broader story, Akasofu has extended his straight line through temperature ups and downs from the year 1800 to the year 2100. Based on this, and including the roller-coaster ups and downs in world temperature trends some scientists call “multi-decadal oscillation,” Akasofu said that we have just crested the top of one of the warm peaks. He predicts that the average global temperature will continue to drop until about 2030.

“In fact, world temperatures have already stopped rising, since 1998, which annoys the IPCC,” he said. He also pointed out that a similar change happened in 1940, when the Earth cooled until about 1975, a time when some scientists predicted a coming ice age.

At the end of this century, in the year 2100, the average world temperature will be a few tenths of a degree warmer than the temperature now, Akasofu predicts. His view contradicts the most recent IPCC predictions of world temperatures rising by 3 to 6 degrees Celsius by 2100.

Akasofu is no stranger to the role of contrarian. He has followed gut feelings throughout his career, such as the time he looked beyond an accepted idea about the aurora and came up with the theory of the aurora substorm, when the aurora bursts with activity more than once each night.

Aurora scientists will remember him for that insight, and they still refer to his 1964 substorm paper as a classic. But how will climate scientists remember him—as someone who tried to oversimplify a complex equation, or as a visionary who saw something other people overlooked? Time, and temperature, will tell.